You Can Imagine Evolution w/o Teleology
0
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
 
 
imagine
 
 
 
 
16
     
     
    Savagery    circling several doubts
              not recommended
              way to make them less
      leaked to guarantee
      counts as a works of "art"
     
    phrasing irregularities
      frequencies rather than probabilities
          and then, further along in the debate:
      mechanisms vs. judgments
     
      where are the yardsticks?
      surgery    circling sentences
      across roads by the light of a moon.
     
    Intuition is at fault —
    Conjunction: it’s a mistake
      and then darkness.
    How the hell do you know that?
    And if you do how did we get to be so smart?
      Still waiting for the surveillance tapes.
    If you can prove it — a recurrent theme
          prescribed
      pool of probability.
     
     
     
     
    Night and Waking
     
      When we can see desire formulate its own body we have no choice but to listen to its beckoning, but as a ghost it is not even like itself and so we contemplate, ask others, think through the consequences of going with that specter. When darkness comes its hard to see bodies at all and thus, we have trouble distinguishing the specter from the tangible incarnation. Of course, we could call it all into question. How the machine works? Whether we exist? What is the ontological status of that ghost, or that voice? But we don’t. We go along, up staircases made of books, until our heads hit the ceiling and we awaken to the aroma of instant coffee.
     
     
     
 
 
r a v e n